Movies get banned all the time in different parts of the world for a variety of reasons. No matter how fair and logical it might seem to someone, it is generally negative to outright ban a movie. As the examples from all around the world show, the reasons range from outright silly misunderstandings to political motivations.

RELATED:Underappreciate Foreign Horror Films On Netflix

Ultimately, it should be up to the consumer to decide whether or not they want to watch a movie or turn it off halfway through. The same goes for parents making sure their kids are not consuming content they shouldn’t be or are at least given the appropriate context before viewing it.

Sam Raimi’s debut feature is an inspiring feat. The director and crew raised the money themselves and did all they could to create the magical horror experience viewers still enjoy to this day.The Evil Deadis full of blood and gore, but it is nothing extreme andnever strives for realism.

Bruce Campbell in Evil Dead (1981)

This didn’t stop the movie from earning the title of a video nasty, a collection of films that were released without a proper content rating. Eventually, these movies were pulled from stores, leaving the movie almost inaccessible for about 6 years until the runtime was slightly trimmed for a new home release. There is a pretty uncomfortable scene involving sentient trees assaulting a young woman(something that director Sam Raimi regrets), which could be the main reason for the status.

5Andrei Rublev Was Banned In The Soviet Union Because It Was About Artistic Freedom

Andrei Tarkovski’s films are largely not overtly subversive or anti-regime. They faced a lot of pushback from the Soviet government more for their unique style than for any political themes.Andrei Rublevwas a large exceptionsince it dealt with artistic freedom and for being a work of historical fiction.

RELATED:Scariest Black And White Movies

Andrei Rublev 1965 film main character

There was a screening in Moscow but no wide releaseuntil the 1970s, when it only came out with significant edits. Only in the 1990s did the original 205-minute version see the light of day, thanks to the Criterion Collection.

4The Cats In Roar Mauled The Non-Union Crew

The story aboutRoar’sproduction is far more interesting than any movie that could possibly have been filmed. Director Noel Marshall and Star Tippi Hedren basically lived and raised the animals featured in the film, which mostly consisted of big cats. Animal trainers warned of the danger of filming with multiple big cats, but production continued anyway.

What was supposed to be a six-month production ended up taking five years and resulted in dozens upon dozens of injuries on set. While the film saw international distribution, it was not even given to theMPAA for certification for decades and therefore left unwatchable.Several reasons were seen for this, ranging from unfair distribution deals to the use of non-union actors. Only a few years ago did it see a proper theatrical release.

Roar actors surrounded by tigers in bed

3People Thought Cannibal Holocaust Was A Snuff Film

The found footage genre does not fool anyone anymore. BeforeBlair Witchclearly established the formula,Cannibal Holocaustwas already toying with the concept. It was so convincing that many countries thought it was a real documentary that showcased murder and cannabilism. The film was unwatchable in many countries for decades,including the UK.

RELATED:Horror Movie Protagonists Who Suffered The Most

The director had to actually clear his name in court and prove the actors were still alive. While no murder is depicted in the film, the animal deaths are real, so anyone interested in the film should be wary of this. Despite being lumped in with a lot of the camp from the 1980s, the movie also has a serious anti-colonial message.

2The Death Of Stalin Was Banned In Russia

The Death of Stalinis a comedy about the power struggle that followedJoseph Stalin’s death in 1953. Russia banned the movie upon release because it felt the movie was making a mockery of its history and leaders.

Joseph Stalin was responsible for the deaths of literally millions of people, so it is not like the man is worthy of any respect whatsoever.Additional reasons citedfor the ban include allegations that the film was an attempt to spark unrest within the country. If a simple film could do this, it must be the greatest film of all time.

Cannibal holocaust two characters and a watch

1The Lost Letter Was Banned In The Soviet Union For Making Fun Of Royalty

In the Soviet Union, a film had to gain a final stamp of approval before distribution. A fully completed and cut movie could never see the light of day if one higher-up viewing the film thought it was inappropriate for the masses. This happened to many films but was particularly harsh on many Ukrainian films now considered classics by the country. What makesThe Lost Letterso unique is it is a fairly harmless historical comedy about a Cossack warrior tasked with bringing a letter to a nameless Czarina.

It mocks Russian royalty, but not the then-modern government. This was still enough to see it shut out from public release for well over a decade. Often, Ukrainian films were also banned for “Nationalist Sentiments,” which mostly means it acknowledges Ukraine and its culture as something separate from Russia. Other Ukrainian films that faced cuts or bans for years includeBabylon XXandEarth.

the death of stalin Jason Isaacs in uniform

The lost letter ukrainian movie